Brown’s chapters 9-11 are all about
course/lesson planning. I enjoyed the way Brown gave a concrete example of all
the different steps of planning a curriculum. It made it easier to think about.
A valid point he made was about the quality of teachers. Many times the
successfulness of a course is dependent on its instructor. Since I have decided
to become an educator, I have spent a lot of time thinking about what kind of
teacher I want to be. There’s an important balance between being an
approachable teacher and one that facilitates knowledge acquisition. It is
important that the students feel comfortable enough to ask questions, but not
so much that the teacher is seen more like a friend than an educator. Students
might give high rating to “nice” teachers, but even though they have friendly
personalities, did they cover material? A stern teacher might get more material
covered. I want to make sure I have a balance of both in my classroom.
Lesson planning is the topic of
chapter 10. When teaching ELLs it is vitally important to allow time for the
students to communicate and interact with each other to produce language.
Therefore, teacher talk should be at a minimum and student talk should be
strongly utilized. This does not mean that teachers should not talk at all.
They should ask the students questions and facilitate discussion. But, students
should have many opportunities during class to produce the language. Also, I
feel that it is important to over-plan when it comes to lesson planning. If the
lesson is to end early, the teacher should still have activities in mind that
she would be able to do. Otherwise, students are missing out of prime learning
time.
The dialogue in chapter 13:
Monitoring Teaching Acts in Kuma’s book helped me to understand one way of evaluating
how a teacher presents her lesson. In the beginning of the chapter, the
sections seemed theoretical and unclear. After reading the dialogue, I had many
critiques that were addressed in the evaluation of the lesson. The part that
was the most upsetting to me was the numerous times she passed up learning
opportunities. When a student repeatedly asks a question, usually they
genuinely want to know the answer. I bet it was difficult for the observer to
watch the teacher and not say anything at the time about that. If you were the
teacher, would you have addressed the housing issue of homeless people living
under the bridge? To me, it is acceptable to get off topic if the students are
still learning and if it is somewhat related to the lesson. For example, I got
through 50% of my last lesson at the ELI on schooling. However, the reason we
were unable to get through the lesson was that the students had things to add
about what we were talking about. I had no problem going on a tangent because
they were interested in the topic and asking questions.
No comments:
Post a Comment